I'm still unable to get my head around why Arsenal above all clubs are so obsessed and hopeful City's dominance never took off. On Twitter constantly, City fans receive statements that Nasri is a "benchwarmer" and one that never fails to amaze me is seeing fans wishing United won the league so they can argue the point they got one over Nasri.
Questions:
1. Were they, or were they not United's title rivals for ten years?
2. What have they won since we had Pearce? Hughes and Mancini in charge that is better than what we have?
3. Why would you be focused on a "small team with no history" rather than your own?
4. Did the famous "Invincible" team all come on Bosman transfers, as every fan seems to relate to winning things "the gracious way".
I know for many years City fans were hopeful of the success that was happening down the road for the best part of twenty years, but a team who you classify as a "smaller" club Arsenal fans would rather see beaten, rather than your greatest title rivals for the best part of a decade?
They are evidently still upset with the Nasri deal that happened last summer and its laughable to think that some of these people have no concept on life. I often forward the question if you were offered a new job at a new state of the art company, would you accept or reject it it? The answers are now on a postcard......
More of these economical genius need to take a look at the link above, the only proof anyone has unless I'm missing something?
No comments:
Post a Comment